Cultural psychologists argue that passionate love is largely a Western phenomenon. In the West, marriage is seen as the culmination of a loving relationship. In cultures where arranged marriages occur, the relationship between love and marriage is the other way around.
Levine et al. (1995) found that individualistic countries were more likely to rate love as essential for marriage and to agree that the disappearance of love is a sufficient reason to end a marriage. Dion & Dion (1993) have noted that in traditional societies, marriage is often seen as more than just the union of two individuals; it is held to be a union and alliance between two families. Whereas Americans tend to view marriage as a lifetime companionship between two individuals in love, people of many other cultures view marriage more as a partnership formed in order to have children and for economic and social support.
Aim
Participants
Materials & Procedure
Results
| Marriage Type | Duration | Mean Rubin Score (out of 91) |
|---|---|---|
| Love Marriages | < 1 year | 70 |
| > 10 years | 40 | |
| Arranged Marriages | < 1 year | 58 |
| > 10 years | 68 |
Conclusion
Gupta & Singh's (1982) study highlights the impact of cultural context on marriage dynamics. The findings suggest that arranged marriages in India, which align with collectivist values, show increasing or stable love over time. In contrast, love marriages, which mirror more individualistic Western ideals, begin with strong affection but decline over time. This supports the idea that in individualistic cultures (like the West), passionate love is central to marriage, and its absence is a valid reason for divorce. In collectivist cultures, marriage is more about family unions and stability, with love developing or enduring as a result of this commitment.